Archive for January, 2010

Thoughts on Harry Reid and the position of Senate Majority Leader


28 Jan

As discontent grew over how health care reform has been handled since the end of last summer, Senator Harry Reid(D-NV) became a lightning rod for many progressives as evidenced by many posts on Daily Kos that are anti-Reid in substance, and he became a symbol for the futility of being a centrist when the times have clearly shown that being out there and proudly on the left is the way to victory and our nation mandated that on November of 2008.  Now, Reid’s hopes of re-election grow slimmer with each passing day, and he has been widely criticized on both sides of the political spectrum.  This month, we learned that during the Obama campaign in 2008, Reid said something in language that was politically insensitive, but uncomfortably true concerning a portion of the American electorate.   There were calls for Reid to resign.   I also think Reid should resign but for a much different reason.   Reid’s leadership has been unacceptably mediocre, and his seat could be held on to without him there.   A much better Senate Majority Leader could then get a progressive agenda done.

This week, a Research 2000 poll done for Daily Kos showed that Reid has a significant unfavorable rating and would be beaten by either Danny Tarkanian or Sue Lowden if the general election were held now. THE Kossack himself put it very nicely;  Reid is Toast.   The poll shows that there isn’t any particular love for Republicans in Nevada, they have even less favorable numbers than the Democrats.  No, Nevada is just sick of ineffectual, anti-choice Harry Reid.  Also, so far Reid’s likely opponents are not top-shelf Republicans either, and as Matt Yglesias showed us a few weeks ago, Lowden wants to make sure that Fake People don’t get jobs. But it could get even worse for Reid, as the Las Vegas Sun reports that Nevada’s Lieutenant Governor Brian Krolicki is seriously considering running against Reid. Krolicki has won statewide office three times, and is John McCain’s preferred candidate for the Senate seat.   But of course, as John Tehan has told me before, the ballgame could really change if  Nevada’s other Senator, John Ensign has to resign due  what the FBI is probing him on.

Reid has been the leader of the Democrats in the Senate sine 2005, and has been Majority Leader since 2007.   Since Reid has held that position, we’ve had numerous opportunities to end the War in Iraq sooner, we could have held telecommunication companies liable for breaking the law by spying on us, we could have ended discrimination against gays and lesbians in the military, we could have enacted a carbon tax that would have started us on the road to reducing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and showed Europe and Asia our greatness at Copenhagen, and we could have had the start of universal health coverage.  Most people will blame President Obama for the lack of progress in 2009, but Obama is not a Prime Minister, he’s our President, and therefore he is limited in what laws he can enact.   Harry Reid is the closest thing we have to a Prime Minister, and the lion’s share of responsibilities for the failures of Congress rest at his feet.  Granted, Reid can claim that he helped close the pay gap for women, got tougher on the credit card companies, passed a much needed Recovery Act that is still helping this country, and is very close to doing what others have failed to do in the past: pass a comprehensive health care reform bill, albeit a severely watered-down one that falls short of universal coverage.  As I was watching Gov. Bob McDonnell’s(R-VA) well-chereographed answer to the State of the Union address, I was struck by something he quoted.  From the Gospel of Luke 12:18(NIV) “From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded; and from the one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked. ”   Reid was given a supermajority of 60 to enact legistation that America had mandated by electing Barack Obama and voting out so many Republicans.   For failing miserably at getting most of what was set out to be done in 2009, and for continuing to let Joseph Lieberman(I-CT) have a gavel, Harry Reid should do the honorable thing and step down as Majority Leader.

A real Majority Leader wouldn’t have made the mistakes Reid made in aproaching health care reform.   For one thing, a great Majority Leader would have  kept a Medicare for All, Canada-style bill on the table as a sort of “nuclear option” that could be passed through reconciliation with 51 votes or 50 plus Vice President Joseph Biden.   And when the Gang of Six were letting the teabaggers define what was the bill was by sitting on their asses, Reid should have told some other Finance committee members to do their own bill and leave Baucus in the dust.   If this was done, we could have had bills pass through both houses at the end of July or at the very latest, the beginning of September.   When Lieberman was holding the whole thing hostage, Reid should have threatened to strip him of his gavel, tar and feather him and then change the Senate Rules to invoke cloture at 59.   It also may have been a mistake to try and do everything in one massive bill instead of four or five very strategically written bills, some that would have gone through the reconciliation process at the start and some that we know we could have the ladies from Maine get on board with(with or without some horse trading and Lieberman would be irrelevant).  As it is, Reid needs to start doing a bill through reconciliation so the House can then pass the Senate Bill, and President Obama can sign the Senate Bill with the reconciliation patch as law.

As to who would replace Reid as Majority Leader, his second-in-command, the Majority Whip is Sen. Dick Durbin(D-IL).  Durbin is a bona fide progressive with a record to show for it.  Reid has said that Durbin is a “great debater”, and I think he would have enough fire in the belly to do what had to be done to pass some legislation.  Durbin might not have some credibility with the PUMA crowd and some of the more further left because of his close relationship to the President, and some might question if he was too close to the Chicago machine.   I would be perfectly fine with Durbin as Majority Leader, and I think most of us feel the same.  I would suggest another candidate however, just so we can have an alternative.   Sen. Tom Harkin(D-IA) is a beloved progressive from a swing state that often helps to decide the winner of the nominations of both parties.   Having a Majority Leader that is in touch with America’s Heartland would really give our agenda more credibility, and most of the past Majority Leaders came from states that weren’t on either coast.   Harkin is also close to the Clintons which could bring some of those PUMAs back into doing what needs to be done on the streets to advance our agenda.   It would also help that Harkin was the chief sponsor of the American with Disabilities Act.    I certainly welcome any other suggestions for Majority Leader though.

If Reid has any honor or sense left in him, he’ll pass the torch to someone else to be Majority Leader, so that the Democratic agenda could still get done.   I’m also still hopeful for someone to challenge Reid in a primary, so it would still be possible to hold onto that seat.   If he doesn’t resign, November 2010 could be the final verdict on Reid’s job as Majority Leader.   I am still hopeful he’ll do the right thing.

Progressively Yours,

Pistol Pete

2010 Races to Watch: Merrick Alpert vs. Richard Blumenthal in CT’s Democratic Primary for Senate


21 Jan

Last time, I blogged on Connecticut’s only good senator, Chris Dodd.  Now the less is said about the other really bad senator from the Nutmeg State the better.   Currently, there are two Democrats who have announced their intention to be Connecticut’s next senator and hopefully beat the living tar out of the Republican primary winner, whether it be Peter Schiff, Rob Simmons or Linda McMahon, all of whom are obviously wrong for Connecticut.    The two Democrats are Merrick Alpert, a veteran and businessman from Groton and Richard Blumenthal, the Attorney General for Connecticut.    I’ll now say what my initial impressions of both are.

Alpert is currently the only one with a Senate Campaign website.   It is called Merrick For A Change.  His website does have some progressive bona fides to it.  He states his belief that “Access to quality health care is a right of every citizen” under Health Care on his Issues page.  He also said that preventative care and other basic health services need more funding.  He also has a Clean Government page under Issues where he’d write new tougher regulations on lobbyists and corporate PACs.   He shares a strong belief in Head Start with Dodd.  His Education page does lack his stance on charter schools, an issue that he should let the voters know where he stands on it since charter schools have an impact on unions and his stance would either attract or repulse labor votes.   He doesn’t have an Environment page under Issues, which is a little concerning but hopefully it will be added soon.   I called his campaign office, and talked to one of his staff.  He seemed knowledable, courteous and would get back to me about specifics on Alpert’s take on climate change and the environment.  His staffer did mention that Alpert is for High Speed Rail though.   Overall, I think he does have a good webpage.   It does need more fleshing on the issues like as I mentioned the Environment, but also Labor(does he support the Employee Free Choice Act?), Choice(for or against Stupak?),  and the Deficit(will he increase taxes and if so how?).

Blumenthal announced that he was running two weeks ago.  His only website is the Connecticut AG’s page, so he is kind of a sphinx on some issues right now.   I would think by now he’d have the start of his campaign website, but alas no.   So I would have to give him a D in that regard so far, but he does have plenty of time to articulate his positions on the Economy, Health Care, the Environment, Labor and Gay Rights.   From what I hear, he joined with Spitzer a few years back to go after AIG for something, which is a plus.   He seems to be on the side of the consumer rather than the banks.   He has some very good initial poll ratings against the Republicans, and he is a very experienced Attorney General.   My fear is that he’ll run a lacklaster campaign a la Martha Coakley and then get hammered by the Tea Party and/or the Connecticut for Lieberman party in the general election.   I’ll be waiting to see if he puts a campaign website out by February.

So we have two possibly good candidates to support for the Democratic nomination in Connecticut, and if one or both meet the criteria for funding their campaign, then we keep alive the greatness that Dodd has given us over the years and we stop the Tea Party from further encroaching into New England.   Connecticut cannot afford another Joe Lieberman or Blanche Lincoln, and we can help make sure that doesn’t happen.

Progressively Yours,

Pistol Pete

Proposed by-laws for the PAC


15 Jan

It’s time to start brainstorming the by-laws for this organization, so here goes a first pass:

This will be a small-d democratically controlled operation. Members will vote on these by-laws, and there will be votes for any changes – majority rules.

1.) Polls will be conducted on three “dollar-days” – $2.00 Tuesday, $3.00 Thursday and $5.00 Fridays
2.) Money will be collected quarterly (13 weeks), on the 15th of the month prior to the beginning of the quarter.
3.) New members will be billed for a full quarter no matter where their join date falls – their balance will be adjusted in the following quarter to pro-rate their membership into the quarterly billing cycle. For example: A new member signs up when there’s 6 weeks left in the current quarter. They pay 13 weeks in advance, and they are billed for six weeks instead of 13 in the next billing cycle. In subsequent billing cycles, they are billed 13 weeks in advance, on the same schedule as every other member.
4.) Tip income will go to legitimate office expenses, including a stipend for the treasurer if enough funds are developed to support a stipend. I’m thinking once tips reach $500 per week, we would begin paying half of it to the treasurer, but we need a steering committee to iron out details in this area.
5.) We will keep a database of national races, both primary and general elections, as well as issue advocacy opportunities from across the country. Any dues paying member may add a race or issue to the database.
6.) We will keep a “candidate pool” from among the candidates running in those elections, or the folks seeking to influence the issue advocacy. Any dues paying member may add a candidate to the candidate pool.
7.) In the first week, there will be one vote taken, in which a slate of candidates will be nominated for the following week’s award. In the second week, one of the candidates will be chosen to receive the week’s award, and a new slate of candidates for the following week will be selected.
8.) Award recipients will go back into the candidate pool and will be ineligible for new awards for some period of time – this is another area where we need input from a steering committee.
9.) The books will be open for examination by any dues paying member at any time.

So there’s a beginning – please weigh in with a comment or two and let me know your thoughts…

Progressive Profiles: Chris Dodd


11 Jan

After hearing Senator Christopher Dodd(D-CT) announce his retirement last week, I instantly felt saddened as the Senator was one of the most experienced voices for progressives in Congress, then I felt proud that Dodd once again showed that he is the only honorable senator from Connecticut, and proved that he is the antithesis of Connecticut’s other senator, Rat Bastard Joseph Lieberman. Dodd chose to allow the people of Connecticut to continue to have someone who truly represents them in areas like health care, labor, the environment and consumer protection rather than satisfy his ego and continue to hold on to something that was increasingly out of his grasp like Lieberman chose to do in 2006.   Dodd should be remembered as the Anti-Lieberman.  Integrity and progressive values up until the end.

During the last Session of Congress which ended in December 2008, Sen. Dodd was the third most progressive vote in the Senate according toVoteview(link is below).

http://voteview.com/sen110.htm

Obviously, Dodd retiring at the end of the 111th Session of Congress is a loss for progressives in the short-term.   Hopefully, his successor, whom we hope is a Democrat will also be a champion for progressive ideals and not be weighed down by the baggage that Sen. Dodd had.    I will certainly be watching the 2010 Senate race in Connecticut, and will update on it as more information becomes available.
(more…)

Member survey providing proof that this concept works


08 Jan

As of this writing, we’ve had 15 people respond and tell us the donation level they would feel comfortable with in the survey. The math works out like this:

9 votes at $2.00 = $18.00 per week
4 votes at $3.00 = $12.00 per week
5 votes at $5.00 = $25.00 per week

That’s a total of $55.00 per week, or $2,860.00 annually. I’ve been raising money online for the past three years – people from DailyKos will remember my fundraising for Al Franken during the recount. In all that time, I think I’ve raised a little over $10,000.00 for all of my efforts, but this system allows just 15 people to raise 28.6% of my three year total.

Extrapolating that, 50 people will match my three year total in just one year – and 1,000 people will dwarf it. I don’t want any money today – if you’re willing to participate when we’re ready to begin collections, please register for an account and vote in the member survey. I don’t want to begin collections until we’re sure to be generating at least $200.00 per week. In the meantime, I’m in need of a steering committee so we can decide how best to spend the tip income, so leave a comment here or email me if you’re interested in that.

You can support Peanut Butter PAC and help to spread the word by making a purchase at our Zazzle store:


make custom gifts at Zazzle

Donations to Peanut Butter PAC are not tax deductible

What’s it all about? PeanutButterPAC explained…


04 Jan

PeanutButterPAC.org is truly a people-powered public policy PAC. The concept is fully explained here in our “about” page:

About PeanutButterPAC.org

Right now we are in the formation stage – if you’re interested, all we ask is that you register for an account and leave us an email where we can get in touch with you when we are ready to go. We’re planning to launch by mid-February, and we want to be up and running like a well-oiled machine well in advance of the 2010 election cycle. Also, please vote in the member survey so that we can get a sense of how our initial rollout may perform financially.

As of right now, 10 people have completed the survey, and the numbers total to $41 per week, over $2,000 per year. What will that look like if we have 1,000 members, or 5,000? We will wield some serious progressive clout – please join today…